Accident Investigation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 118

Accident Investigation - Essay Example With reference to daily life routine that involves instances that expose one to accidents, as well as prior research, it is alleged that 96% of this accidents are because of unsafe human acts and methodologies of living. The 4% remainders are accidents facilitated by unsafe conditions. Taking a leap of the work environments, it is evident that these areas are not strange to accidents and such misfortunes. Incident investigation in such areas usually comes as a reactive approach by the entire company. In some instances, though rare, the community comes in as those who fall victim are born of the community (Manuele 59). With the revelation of information such as details of the injured individual, the nature of the injury endured and the body orientation to the particular line of duty, it brings light to the situation, giving precision as to whom or what was at fault. This kind of information makes it possible to answer questions that eye at discovering what happened when it happened, and how it happened. From this, comes revelation on what exactly tend to transpire. This is where research puts percentages, marking the main causes of most of these accidents. It is widely discovered; true to prior research, that majority of these accidents tend to happen because of unsafe acts by the parties involved, thus the repercussions faced. Viewing, in particular, the cause of an accident involving the collapse of a building may mainly lie on parties involved in the putting up of that particular building. In such a situation, blame and fault may fall on the architect or else the contractor who facilitated the building of that actual structure. For example, he or she may have poorly planned and designed the putting up of that building (Manuele 108). This may lead to further destruction of poor management may facilitate the use of poor building material, low wages for the workers that have the negative impact on them, leading to poor worker services.

Medieval Philosophy Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Medieval Philosophy - Term Paper Example Examining the writings of Augustine and Aquinas provides textual comparisons in understanding how the two philosophers diverged in their opinions. Augustine The discussion that Augustine held about the Academicians shed light on his point of view where truth was concerned. He relates to his reader, within his letter to Romanianus, that the Academicians seem to believe that there are absolutes and that the truth is a defined place, although they do not know where that place exists. He suggests that moving away from the Academicians and towards philosophy reveals that the truth is defined by the fact that the truth is truth, that it moves through the subject and rests in places where all can discern that it is true, a common place where wisdom is attained. In finding the center of truth, Augustine believes that it is through the study of philosophy that truth can be approached, but not through listening to those who would say that they know the truth definitively without knowing truth. Cicero states in Academica 2.10.32 that â€Å"[The Academicians] hold that something is plausible and in a way â€Å"truth like†, and that they employ this as a guide both in the conduct of life and in [philosophical] investigation and discussion† (Augustine 37). He goes on to discuss Zeno by saying â€Å"He contended that nothing can be perceived except what is true in such a way that it can be distinguished from the false by a dissimilarity in their marks, and that opinion should not enter the mind of the wise man† (Augustine 40). His purpose in going against the Academicians can be summed up in this statement that Augustine makes â€Å"your Academicians should be likewise laughed at, since they say that in this life they follow something truth like, although they do not know what the truth is† (Augustine 44). The Academicians sought the truth, but did not claim to have found it. Augustine discusses that wise men had, previous to the Academicians, been wise because their culture determined that they knew the truth. Academicians, on the other hand, felt that a wise man continued on a search for the truth, but did not ever claimed to have found it. Augustine states that â€Å"Reason, then†¦shows you that a wise man is the kind of person who is not ignorant of wisdom† (Augustine 60). Augustine makes the argument that human beings can find wisdom and that they can discern the truth. He suggests that having knowledge that determines the truth is in the purview of the wise man. Without this accession, there can be no such thing as a wise man. This argument, then, is suggesting that rational thought is in defining what is true. He argues against those who would suggest that it is not possible to ’know’ or to assess ’truth’. In understanding, the human being shows that he has a capacity beyond animals. In his discussion with Evodius, he shows that the human sense of rationality comes from being abl e to understand beyond the inner sense. The inner sense can discern existence, but human reason can understand that there is existence. He moves through his discussion of understanding to explain wisdeom, then back to truth. He states â€Å"